Nightly Test Report · Day 3, Segment 2

North Platte, NE → Aurora, NE

152.3 mi, I-80 corridor (Option 1) · ProPower V2V charging, two BMS-cycled sessions (~64 min combined) · continues Day 3, Segment 1 (Broomfield→North Platte); Segment 3 (Aurora→Adel KOA) still pending
End-of-segment location (approx.): Aurora, NE (near I-80 Exit 332) — as of 2026-07-16 13:42:29 CDT
01

Run Summary

North Platte, NE Aurora, NE
Track — 900 plotted points (1-Hz TrackLogger, downsampled 10:1) · start ● end ● no basemap, route shape only

Day 3, Segment 2 of the Broomfield→Oshkosh leg (I-80 Option 1), covering North Platte, NE to the Aurora, NE Love’s (I-80 Exit 332) — the planned halfway fuel stop toward the Adel, IA KOA. One continuous OBDLink recording, 152.30 mi, 149.78 min (2.496 hr), average speed 61.0 mph — a steady, nearly constant-speed cruise for essentially the entire segment. Route is a gentle, consistent net descent (≈2,801 ft → ≈1,807 ft, TrackLogger altitude) rather than true flat plains, but grade variation within the segment is modest. OAT climbed to a segment peak of 93.2°F, consistent with the building I-80 corridor humidity/heat flagged in trip planning. No driver notes accompanied this upload.

02

Fuel & Charge Accounting

ProPower BMS-cycled twice this segment (two ~32-min ON windows separated by a ~60.5-min OFF window), consistent with the documented hot-weather cycling pattern — not a deliberate Phase A/B test design. HV SOC fell substantially across the segment despite the two full-output charging windows.

Segment energy summary
MetricValueNote
Total fuel9.697 galmeasured, Trip Fuel PID
Distance / duration152.30 mi / 149.78 minavg 61.0 mph, 15.71 mpg (blended, incl. ProPower)
ProPower delivered (ON windows)6.240 kWh ACtwo windows >3 kW threshold, ~64 min combined (42.7% of moving time)
ProPower duty42.7%of moving time, BMS-driven on/off, not route-tied
SOC start → end54.3% → 41.4% (−12.8 pts)≈9.9 kWh net drawn from the 77 kWh pack despite 6.24 kWh in
Implied gross house/aux draw≈16.1 kWh over 2.50 hr (≈6.5 kW avg)modeled: net HV consumption + ProPower-in; not a direct measurement
Watch

The 12.8-point SOC drop on a hot (93.2°F peak OAT), humid I-80 day is consistent with the Thermal Load Management doc’s expectation that house loads (HVAC/canopy/etc.) can outpace ProPower charging between BMS cycles — not treated as a fault. Worth confirming canopy state at the next upload; Segment 1 noted an unplanned canopy-up condition for its first ~191 mi, and no canopy status was called out for this segment.

Instrumentation note

A continuous ~0.95–1.07 kW baseline was present on the DC/AC converter output channel even during BMS-off windows (≈1.53 kWh over 85.7 min this segment) — not counted as delivered ProPower energy above. This matches an unexplained baseline flagged on Day 1 (~0.94 kW, 8.24 kWh over that leg) and appears to be a recurring characteristic of this channel, not a one-off. Still unresolved whether it reflects genuine low-level trickle output or a sensor/converter floor.

03

ProPower Incremental Fuel — State B

Segment boundaries for ProPower follow the two BMS-driven ON windows rather than route markers — state explicitly so this isn’t mistaken for a deliberate test design.

Incremental fuel — measured basis
BasiskWh ACConversionGal
(A) Measured — ÷7.70 kWh AC/gal baseline6.240KB baseline, ~22.7% full-chain0.810 gal
Measured

Effective AC yield this segment is reported at the established 7.70 kWh/gal baseline by construction — this segment’s data doesn’t support an independent same-leg ON/OFF yield estimate (near-constant speed and no clean matched-condition OFF cruise segment at the same grade), so (B) modeled BTE rebuild is skipped rather than forced. No material divergence to flag.

Nightly incremental-GPH regression — LightShip priority metric
TermValue
ProPower coefficient (b)0.0848 gal/hr per kW
Implied rate at 5.8 kW0.492 gal/hr
0.181
Mass basismeasured, 6,949 kg (CAT scale)
Flag

R² = 0.181 is well below the ~0.4 reliability threshold, and the implied 0.492 gal/hr at 5.8 kW sits below the physically plausible 0.55–0.75 gal/hr range from the round-trip measured baseline. Root cause: this segment ran at an essentially constant 61.5 mph cruise for nearly its entire length, so the speed³ term carried almost no variance to help the regression separate aero load from the ProPower and grade terms — the model is underdetermined here, not evidence the true rate is lower. Reported per standing instruction (caveated, not suppressed); do not quote this segment’s 0.492 gal/hr to LightShip as an independent estimate.

Wind cross-check (modeled)
QuantityValue
Mean head/tail componentnot collected this segment
Wind-adjusted expected yieldnot computed
Residual after wind adjustmentnot computed
Skipped

Wind cross-check skipped for this segment by driver request. The Section 03 measured yield above (÷7.70 baseline) and the GPH regression already carry their own caveats independent of wind, so this doesn’t block the rest of the report — but a large unexplained residual, if it existed, would go undetected here. No wind-loaded explanation is available for anything in this report.

04

TrekDrive Fuel Savings — State A

No LightShip TrekDrive state, SOC, or draw-kW telemetry is present in the truck-side OBD dataset (standing limitation). Indirect signal: the electric AC compressor ran at >0 RPM for 99.96% of this segment’s rows — since the TrekDrive interlock disables HVAC and all 120V services while active, near-continuous HVAC operation indicates TrekDrive was effectively not engaged during this segment.

Section 04 is thin/empty this segment by design, not by gap: TrekDrive is being deliberately minimized on hot legs per the Thermal Load Management plan, to avoid stacking battery debt on top of thermal load. This segment’s 93.2°F peak OAT and sustained SOC drawdown (Section 02) are consistent with that plan being followed. No net TrekDrive fuel-savings figure to report.

05

Heat-Enrichment Fuel Penalty — Measured λ

λ threshold: sustained rich = λ < 0.98 at load > 50%, filtered for transient single-sample tip-out/DFCO excursions, restricted to episodes ≥20 s.

Measured

No qualifying sustained enrichment episode this segment. 649 individual rows met the raw λ<0.98 & load>50% filter, but the longest contiguous run was 8 s and nearly all were 2–6 s single/double-sample dips to λ 0.94–0.98 during steady 61.5 mph cruise — ordinary closed-loop trim noise, not protection enrichment. Peak IAT2 this segment was 134.6°F, comfortably under the 140°F Tier-3 throttle-closure threshold, and the gentle net-descent profile kept sustained high-load climbing out of the picture.

Enrichment penalty by segment
SegmentRows λ<thr (sustained)Peak IAT °FMean rich λEst. penalty gal
North Platte → Aurora (full)0 / 0.0%134.60.000 gal
Watch

Per protocol, State-A-vs-State-B-at-temperature comparisons are the priority target on the hot plains east of Denver — this segment doesn’t supply one (no TrekDrive engaged, see Section 04). No penalty reported from transients or insufficient load, as instructed.

06

Thermal & Trim Watch

07

Instrumentation Check

08

Flags & Carry-Forward

RIG: Ford F-150 PowerBoost + LightShip AE.1 · INSTR: OBDLink MX+ (42-PID, 2.0 s) + TrackLogger Pro 1 Hz.
Location approximate, city-level, from last valid GPS row; precise coordinates not published. Measured values green, modeled amber, flags rust — modeled numbers are never presented as measurements.
Source CSV: CSVLog_20260716_101241 (OBDLink) + 2026-07-16_11_12_38 (TrackLogger) · generated 2026-07-18.